FREE FourFourTwo newsletters for all!

Register now and get:
  • The inside track on the big issues
  • Tactical insight from our experts
  • Players to watch
  • Analysis & humour
  • Exclusive competitions
  • Stick-men drawings
  • WAGs, bets, bargains & more
See a sample newsletter
Sign up now to avoid disappointment
And why not check out the magazine?

Fitba' Focus

The Scottish game from the Borders to the Highlands & Islands and beyond


Danny Law

See all posts

How to save Scottish football


Thursday 25 February 2010 17:00

“Can we play you every week?” is a favoured chant of the ebullient football fan everywhere.

Except possibly in the Isles of Scilly Football League, where there are only two teams. It must become tiresome for Garrison Gunners and Woolpack Wanderers to psyche themselves up for another weekly battle against the same set of players.

But it's beginning to look like their claim to fame as the world's smallest league could be under threat from the SPL. This weekend Aberdeen will take on Hearts for the third time in 2010 – and we haven't even made it into March.

After winning on both occasions so far – once in the Scottish Cup and once in the league – the underperforming Dons will be delighted to welcome the Jambos back to Pittodrie on league duty this weekend.

The arrival of such familiar opponents may not spark as much excitement in supporters and reporters alike, although we're becoming accustomed to these regular reunions.

Last Saturday Mark McGhee's men lost in the SPL for the second time this month to bottom of the league Falkirk. Maybe the Dons should start preparing to face the Bairns once more if they fail to make it into the top six, as their current form suggests.

However it isn't only Aberdeen that seems to be playing the same teams over and over again. Motherwell and Hamilton met twice in seven days earlier this month and with only one goal in a tedious 180 minutes it isn't surprising that only 3,133 fans bothered to turn up to watch the second of their meetings – a dire goalless draw.


Empty away-end seats at Tannadice – for the Rangers game

The reason behind this repetitive fixture schedule is the recent wintry weather, which has severely disrupted the SPL calendar this term. Frozen pitches cause numerous matches in Scotland's top division to be postponed around this time of year every season.

When the games do beat the weather, attendances are often noticeably down with many fans opting for a cosy afternoon in front of the box with Jeff Stelling rather than shivering to death in the freezing stands. Who can blame them?

Our annual debate of reverting to summer football comes and goes like the weather, only to be revisited the following December when the snowy showers recommence.

One good solution to this problem of repetitive fixtures and frequent postponements would be to create a 16-team league with the top four teams from the First Division given entry into Scotland's top flight to make up the numbers.

The likes of Dundee, Inverness, Partick Thistle and Ross County wouldn't diminish the standard of the SPL as these sides would be a decent match for many of the sides currently in the league.

Teams would play fewer matches in a 16-team league, where opponents would only meet each other home and away rather than the current three or four times depending on which half of the league you reach after 33 games.

The current 38-game season is too long, with the quality of matches suffering as a direct result. You can only expect so much entertainment from jaded players and squads stretched to the limit after being forced to play as many as three games per week. A shorter season, with room for a winter break, would also benefit the Scottish national team and hopefully the success of our clubs in European competitions.

However, few of the current SPL teams would welcome a 16-team league. For a start it would mean an even smaller share of the collective TV pot of gold. It would also represent fewer matches against the Old Firm – seen as vital for the survival of some smaller clubs.

The Old Firm are also keen to play as many of their showcase matches against each other as possible. Many Celtic and Rangers fans would be quite content to watch their sides battle it out every week, so the idea of meeting six times every year (four times in the league and twice in the cups) is counted by most in Glasgow as blessing rather than curse.

But to this writer, Scottish football should consider a change to the status quo. The current four divisions should be replaced with two 16-team leagues and a pyramid system to allow the ambitious junior and part-time clubs to make the leap up to the professional ranks.

A 16-team SPL would be more refreshing and would lessen the enormous fear of relegation into the First Division, with all the catastrophic consequences that can bring. In the current SPL no team except the top four appears safe and the dreaded R-word is even being mentioned around Aberdeen at present.

It would probably take a cataclysmic series of events before this idea would ever come close to fruition. Pity: our game has been on its knees for a long time and something has to be done to breathe some much needed life back into Scottish football.

More from Fitba' Focus

Scottish stats * Club news
FFT.com: Features * News * Interviews * Home
Interact: Twitter * Facebook * Forums




or to add your comments

About Danny Law

Danny Law is a Scottish football fan and reporter who can usually be found on a Saturday afternoon filing copy from the press box of a freezing SPL ground in the hope of a couple of pennies and a pie.
His aims in life are to own a sheepskin coat, report from every ground in Scotland and interview Zinedine Zidane in French.
He is neither Danny Law the former Sussex cricketer nor Danny Law the Malaysian politician. And he is not related to fellow Aberdonian Denis Law, as anyone who has seen the two of them play can concur.

Comments

  February 25, 2010 19:37

blair_omnibus said:

That's a very misleading picture & caption you've used for your article.

There are huge gaps in the away support end v Dundee Utd that night because the fans boycotted the game due to a ridiculous act of robbery.

On the article, extending the current Scottish Premier League to 16 or 18 teams only allows for a big league of not very much quality. This league of little quality then loses all these teams the huge revenue of playing Rangers & Celtic at home twice a season, thus leading to even less money to spend on players & wages.

The one & only thing the SPL can currently do to get it to a point where a base can be built is to lower the prices of admittance, HUGELY. When fans are going to watch their side regularly again, which would happen immediately if it was cheaper, then, and only then, will changes of any significance work properly.

  February 25, 2010 22:14

temjin said:

Although lowering the admittance prices would be a welcomed measure just about in any top division of the main 9 european championships, a 16 team SPL would be probably a very good idea.

Take the portuguese league as an example of a 16 team premier divison.  This format allows points droped by bit teams against minor teams to count as decisive and for big matches to become more eagerly awaited (it only comes twice a year, not 4 times in 6 months). Some mid table teams like Nacional and Braga have profited immensely from this format.

I believe that a 16 team SPL would be a very good thing indeed, with some of the usual also-rans becoming contenders once again.  

  February 25, 2010 22:59

JohnPJones said:

I'd agree with Blair on the prices of tickets. However I think a 16 team league might be a necessity. Fair point in terms of the Gap between the old firm and the rest, but that would persist regardless of how many teams you put in it.

I think a 16 team league would benefit all, and the idea of lost revenue... maybe if the other games can be made into 70% full stadiums, there wouldn't be a problem.

  February 26, 2010 20:29

Ross1873 said:

I agree completely with the article.

Scottish Football needs a radical overhaul, not in 2 years, not in 5 years, now.

  February 26, 2010 20:58

footballfutbolfitba said:

A 16 team SPL is long overdue as it would allow teams some breathing space. At the moment, a team pushing for Europe could lose a couple of games and be dragged towards the relegation zone.

As for saving Scottish football, changing the SPL won't do that.  The whole structure needs to be looked at.  While clubs should never be forced to merge, there are too many teams in the Scottish leagues - two divisions of 16 would be enough.

A pyramid system involving the likes of the junior and Highland League clubs would reward clubs showing a bit of ambition and looking to climb the ladder.

footballfutbolfitba.wordpress.com

  February 27, 2010 22:18

Marrsio said:

I think what you are coming around to is that we desperately need to cull the number of professional teams in Scotland.

London sustains 13 professional teams. Scotland has 42 (41 if you knock out Queen's Park on point of pedantry). There are just too many teams up here and not enough disposable income to sustain them all.

The SFA needs to:

- Restructure the leagues

- Introduce a proper pyramid system

- Re-organise the myriad bodies that ''run'' the game

- Introduce a winter break

- Allow Rangers and Celtic B to compete in the lower leagues

- Abolish the League Cup (or, preferably, mix it with the English League Cup).

- Overhaul youth football and focus more on player-centred development and on technique

- Place a greater responsibility of clubs to find players they release clubs lower down the ladder (this is mandatory in Holland and keeps people in the game). I’d also like to see links between Scottish clubs and US college sport develop for those released at 18.

- Build more centres a la Toryglen around the country.

- Build a national football centre which would include a management training centre, a refereeing centre, indoor pitches, sports science centre etc.

I'd merge a number of teams and move to two professional leagues of 14/15/16 teams.

RCM

leftbackinthechangingroom.blogspot.com

  March 1, 2010 12:04

Gary Parkinson said:

Blair, a small point - it was I, not Danny, who chose and captioned the offending picture. (In most cases the FFT.com writers submit their copy and leave it up to us to find and caption the pictures, just as they would on a magazine or newspaper.)

In this instance, that was simply the only Press Association photo I could find which showed empty seats  – well, in Scotland anyway. Plenty in England, at Middlesbrough, Bolton, Wigan, Blackburn... there's undoubtedly something in your assertation that football is now overpriced.

Thanks for reading and commenting.

Gary Parkinson, Editor, FourFourTwo.com

FourFourTwo.com
Haymarket

FourFourTwo is brought to you by Haymarket Consumer Media & FourFourTwo is part of Haymarket Sport
About Haymarket | International Licensing | © Haymarket Media Group 2010