FREE FourFourTwo newsletters for all!

Register now and get:
  • The inside track on the big issues
  • Tactical insight from our experts
  • Players to watch
  • Analysis & humour
  • Exclusive competitions
  • Stick-men drawings
  • WAGs, bets, bargains & more
See a sample newsletter
Sign up now to avoid disappointment
And why not check out the magazine?

FourFourTwo's Inside Track

Rants and musings from the magazine team


David Hall

See all posts

How we picked the world's 100 best footballers


Monday 28 November 2011 10:00


Yes, it’s back. For a fifth year, we at FourFourTwo have put our heads together to present you with our take on which 100 individuals are truly the greatest players in the world right now.

It hasn’t been easy. Oh, it’s been fun – deciding upon the globe’s best footballers is, of course, the pub conversation to end all pub conversations – at least for the most part, until punches were thrown and coffee was spilt.

For this is the hardest job in football journalism. How do you decide upon the very best? How do you compare a goalkeeper to a striker; a 34-year-old veteran to a prodigious youngster half his age; a gritty, reliable centre-back to a slick trequartista with a slide-rule pass and an eye for goal?

To an extent, of course, you can’t. We’ve worked hard on this list to make it as definitive as possible, but as time changes, so will the protagonists. Form is temporary, class is permanent – but if one of our top 100 now hits a colossal loss of form, that can’t be helped.

So here’s how we at FFT go about it. First, we get a hat and write down the names of every footballer in the world right now...

No, really. We speak to our vast legion of experts from around the globe; the people we turn to for that extra bit of insight on a player or team from their region. Spain, Italy, Portugal, Russia, Brazil – they’ve seen the lot and we’ve canvassed their opinions, to add to our own.

Once we’ve seen our overseas experts’ recommendations and included the domestic players we believe are at the very peak, we have well over 150 names. Then comes the whittling. It’s ruthless: we read every report, look at every stat, watch every video, but if a player doesn’t look the real deal, he’s out. Simple.

A darkened room welcomes us. We have just over 100 names; now we have to put them in a sensible order – no mean feat when you have to consider everything from form and importance within a team, to potential and overall class. Out comes the whiteboard and the markers.

By breaking the list down into positions, we can rank every defender, forward and so on, and once we have each mini-list, slot them together. There’s a lot of scrubbing – fortunately, we’ve not had a repeat of the permanent marker “No, he’s crap” incident from last year.

Finally, we have our top 100, ready for your delectation.

This process has been undertaken every year since 2007, inclusive. Back in those heady pre-Euro 2008 days, England had 13 players in our top 100 – the most of any country. Since then both Spain and Germany have improved immeasurably, while other countries, clubs and leagues have declined or joined them on the rise.

We’ll be asking our global experts on FourFourTwo.com for their take on local success or malaise. We’ll also have, every day from Tuesday to Friday this week, an alphabetical list of the top 10 players in their position – goalkeepers, defenders, midfielders, and forwards (note: this doesn’t necessarily equate to the best 40 players in the world). These will appear daily over at out lists page

Most importantly, we want you to get in touch. Seriously, we do – please join the conversation, because we’ll try to respond to a few questions/rants/death threats about the list towards the end of next week. Send your feedback, however short or long, to @FourFourTwoEd on Twitter with the hashtag #FFT100, or on Facebook, or via email (contact@fourfourtwo.com) – you can even write a letter if you’re so inclined, but please, no more boxes of dog muck...

The January issue, featuring the full feature on the 100 Best Players in the World, is out on Wednesday, December 7. We don’t expect you all to agree with it – but we hope you all enjoy it.

And by the way, top of that first list in 2007 was Kaka, with Lionel Messi a ‘lowly’ fifth. How times change…

LIST FFT's Top Ten Goalkeepers
LIST FFT's Top Ten Defenders
LIST FFT's Top Ten Midfielders
LIST FFT's Top Ten Forwards




or to add your comments

About David Hall

David Hall is editor of FourFourTwo magazine - you can harangue him on Twitter @FourFourTwoEd

Comments

  December 8, 2011 21:42

Joel Oberstone said:

Your list is comprehensive, the collection of players are extremely impressive, yet your process lacks structure or a framework for making something other than gut-level selections based on opinion, however "expert." The problem is that you don't establish a specific set of criteria or metrics to consistently base your selections on (possibly a different set for each position). So you have to agree on that first: what specific yard sticks make sense for each field player (you might want to even distinguish between attacking and holding midfielders). And then you need to determine the relative importance of each metric—they are not all of equal value, are they. Now bring in your experts, collect the specific set of performance measures for each player for each metric and reward those points! Add them all up and, voila! You've got a rationally developed rating system that has been evenly applied to all players. Now you can rank each player at each position and not blush. It will probably be very close to the method that you have used, but it will be completely understandable and easy to explain—not like the hocus pocus method you used under the guise of expert judgment is good enough. No it's not. But with a cool framework to guide the expert judgment, you've got a winner. Thanks for letting me rant.

  December 22, 2011 17:50

Joel Oberstone said:

So, no feedback from the blog on my December 9th criticism for the lack of structure and consistency in the shoot-from-the-hip approach of player selection from the 4-4-2 experts? For example, in you list, how far apart are the ranked players and on what scale of goodness did you measure them? Feedback, gentlemen, feedback. Or have you no rational answer? Are you going to continue to promote a gaggle of experts pouring over the myriad of data in the room and (mysteriously) coming up with a common set of 100 players they hap-hazardly agree on? You could not run a company like that ... for long. Again, your collection of players is formidable, but the process is a black box—just like the silly “black box” Castrol and Actim Indexes. You can do better than this. Cat got your tongue?

FourFourTwo.com
Haymarket

FourFourTwo is brought to you by Haymarket Consumer Media & FourFourTwo is part of Haymarket Sport
About Haymarket | International Licensing | © Haymarket Media Group 2010