FREE FourFourTwo newsletters for all!

Register now and get:
  • The inside track on the big issues
  • Tactical insight from our experts
  • Players to watch
  • Analysis & humour
  • Exclusive competitions
  • Stick-men drawings
  • WAGs, bets, bargains & more
See a sample newsletter
Sign up now to avoid disappointment
And why not check out the magazine?

Inside Swindon Town

Access All Areas at the FourFourTwo-sponsored League One club


The Robins

See all posts

Stockport: That was never a penalty!


Friday 01 May 2009 15:00

Town fan Nick Judd on Stockport's controversial 'punishment' two days before the end of the season...

I’m surprised Swindon Town will be starting next year’s League One campaign on a level playing field with Stockport County.

I’m not referring to the fact that we secured our safety with a 2-1 win over Bristol Rovers last week, but the news that County entered administration on Thursday, only to be ‘punished’ with a 10-point deduction this season.

The points deduction, you’ll find, sees them plummet to one place above the drop-zone. However, as a result of their 4-3 win against Crewe last weekend – and better goal difference – they can’t go down (barring a final day massacre).

The knock-on effect is that they’ll survive the drop and start next season level pegging with the rest of us, with their debt managed by administrators. That’s one pretty big kick in the teeth for all of those clubs – Swindon included – trying to run their businesses prudently.


Putting the edge in Edgeley

I’m no advocate of the points-deduction process. If this rule was applied 10 years ago I’d dread to think where Swindon would be, having gone into administration twice. Ultimately it’s the players and fans punished and not those responsible for mismanagement.

But if these are the rules, then they need to be applied evenly to all clubs. I’m sure Southampton will have something to say about Stockport’s situation. Here’s what the Football League website reported after the Saints went into administration:

“The Board concluded that an administrator had been appointed in respect of the Club or part of its undertaking or assets. Accordingly, it was left with no alternative other than to invoke its 'Sporting Sanctions' regulations and apply a 10-point penalty to the Club. The other provisions of The League's insolvency policy also become effective.

"As the insolvency event occurred after The Football League's deadline of the fourth Thursday in March, the points deduction will take effect either: in the current season, if Southampton avoid relegation to League One; or next season, if the club does not avoid relegation.”

This meant that whatever happened, Southampton would be playing League One football in 2009/10.

And here’s their statement after Stockport entered administration:

“Following the announcement that Stockport County Football Club has gone into administration, The Football League can confirm that a 10-point Sporting Sanction applies with immediate effect in accordance with the Regulations agreed by Football League Clubs.”

This means that Stockport are pretty much guaranteed League One football, too, but in this case it’s hardly a case of “…the most severe penalty”.

Is it too much to ask to have some consistency – and with it, motivation for club owners to run their clubs properly?

Officials of two sides already in the League One drop zone – Crewe and Hereford – slammed the decision on Friday, irked that the Hatters can effectively start next season with a clean slate, despite entering administration.


Has Jim Gannon been given cheques his club can't cash?

"All I would say is that it is unfair because it looks as though Stockport have been spending money they do not have and then they get someone else to pay their debts off," Alex boss Gudjon Thordarson told the club's official website.

"They have gone through the season doing that and those clubs that keep their finances in control are the ones penalised at the end of it. Crewe is a good club and they do things the right way. They don't do anything if they cannot afford it and that is the way it should be. For Stockport to go into administration on the eve of the final game, knowing that the points deduction won't really affect them, is not right."

Bulls chairman and Director of Football Graham Turner, who stood down from the manager's role last week after failing to keep his side away from relegation, believes clubs who enter administration should be demoted a division as punishment.

"Any club going into administration should be automatically relegated," he told his club's official website. "It's too easy for clubs to get themselves into trouble by spending money they haven't got. Stockport are a case in point.

"Jim Gannon had assembled a very good squad of players, but clearly they could not afford them. They've survived in League One, and they will now probably wipe out most of their debts and start again. I think that is grossly unfair to those who pay their taxes on time.

"The 10-point penalty is not sufficient to deter directors from running clubs irresponsibly. It is a big disadvantage in many cases to run a club correctly like we have done. Our relegation is probably down to the fact that we didn't spend money we haven't got."

League One in 2009/10

On a brighter note...

With Southampton and Charlton already demoted from the Championship, and Norwich set to join them this weekend, it’s going to be a year of good/big games that aren’t too far to get to for us Robins next season.

You can add Brentford and possibly Wycombe into that mix as well, which are both good away days. Wycombe have always seen us as something of a derby, while Brentford’s ground provides the opportunity to go on a pub crawl without leaving the vicinity of the stadium!

If Leeds stay down, next season League One will have the appearance of a Premier League from yesteryear, which just goes to show how strong the Football League is these days.

BLOG: Stockport strife hits stars of the future hard 

----------------------------------------------

FourFourTwo.com: More to read...
Inside Swindon Town home
Blogs home 
Latest England news
News home
Interviews home
Forums home
League 1 Forum
FourFourTwo.com home

 



or to add your comments

About The Robins

Continuing FourFourTwo's groundbreaking sponsorship of the Wiltshire side, this blog brings you the triumphs and tragedies from the terraces to the pitch to the boardroom.

Comments

  May 1, 2009 17:16

Doctorbes said:

I understand the sentiments outlined in the article on Stockport County but sadly the author misses a few pretty important points.

First, we as a club have been royally destroyed by businessmen who have treated our club with scant regard while doing shady deals to ensure a rugby union team has a ground to play at. Two, the article suggests we have bought big this season. Eh? On Friday we played with, by my calculation, 9 players who had a close connection with the youth team. Indeed, some of them are so close to the youth team we had to get permission from a headmaster (I"m not making this up) in order that he could play the previous week. True, we did buy two players for a grand total of £400,000 in summer (after selling a player for £750,000), and this was an acknowledged error, but the reasons why County are in administration are not down to trying to "buy success" - more that certain businessmen took away our ability to trade in the way every other club trades. We aren't allowed to generate income from non-footballing activities - including match day hospitality, matchday beer and food sales, etc - and have competed on an uneven playing field all season (in more ways than one, considering the state of our pitch).

Yes, it is a bit unfair that we haven't been punished but if you had lived through the last four months like we have, I'd guess you'd understand that perhaps we've been punished enough.

FourFourTwo.com
Haymarket

FourFourTwo is brought to you by Haymarket Consumer Media & FourFourTwo is part of Haymarket Sport
About Haymarket | International Licensing | © Haymarket Media Group 2010