FREE FourFourTwo newsletters for all!

Register now and get:
  • The inside track on the big issues
  • Tactical insight from our experts
  • Players to watch
  • Analysis & humour
  • Exclusive competitions
  • Stick-men drawings
  • WAGs, bets, bargains & more
See a sample newsletter
Sign up now to avoid disappointment
And why not check out the magazine?

La Liga Loca

A sideways look at Spanish football


Tim Stannard and Simon Talbot

See all posts

Why UEFA are right to sanction Atletico Madrid


Wednesday 15 October 2008 11:00

The Spanish press reaction to the roof caving in on poor old Atlético’s world - not that much of the Vicente Calderón has a roof, mind - could have appeared in one of three ways on Wednesday.

a) a thoughtful investigation into why UEFA decided to take such dramatic action against Atlético and a discussion into the steps needed to ensure there is no repeat in the future.

b) a hysterical bout of finger-pointing, conspiracy theory spreading and baseless, xenophobic attacks on the French. 

c) a discussion on how wonderful on a scale of one to 10 Pep Guardiola / Messi / Barcelona are as a concept.

Unsurprisingly, c) was the option chosen by the Catalan papers who are apparently oblivious and uninterested in the anxiety over at Atlético.

Everywhere else, b) is the favoured approach. And then some.


Stewards wade into Marseille supporters at the Calderon 

The general furious feeling in the Madrid-based papers is that an unlucky Atlético Madrid have been used, abused and - to put it bluntly - screwed by The Man. But more especially, the French.

It is hard to find a single opinion to suggest otherwise within the panic-stricken pages of either Marca or AS.

“Platini, the UEFA president, is French. The club whose Ultras were attacked is French and the players who were offended were French, too,” moaned the idiotic Alfredo Relaño in AS adding two and two together and coming up with 17 in Wednesday’s editorial.

“I urge a peaceful protest to support Atlético Madrid,” writes Roberto Gómez in Marca, claiming that the club has “a magnificent president in Enrique Cerezo,” who should be backed 100% during these dark times.

La Liga Loca would like to point out to Gómez that the Calderón club literally has a criminal as a president who was found guilty of fiddling Atlético’s books but avoided prison due to a statute of limitations.

All this ‘j’accuse-ing’ and fro-ing means that option a) - the most sensible of the lot, has been tossed out of the journalistic window without a second thought by the local press on what has been one of their worst days for some time.

La Liga Loca has some home truths for Atlético Madrid. UEFA have imposed this sanction as they are fearful - with justification - of the potentially deadly combination of an out of control police force, the club’s general incompetence and the visit of thousands of English and Dutch football fans.

Whilst the Spanish press have repeatedly highlighted the UEFA match report praising the ‘perfect organisation’ of the game against Marseille, it has overlooked the key factor which has brought the football body to the conclusion that a two-match stadium ban is the only punishment possible.

Yes, they may have been able to move the press area to the car park and label the toilets in two languages, but there was too much evidence of the complete inability and unwillingness for Atlético Madrid to take responsibility for what happens in their own stadium.


Similar scenes in February for the visit of Bolton 

UEFA’s report is critical of the local police’s decision to wade into the Marseille end, shortly before the match started, in an attempt to remove a banner with the word ‘Ultras’ on it and a picture of a pirate’s skull.

“It was not treated as racist or religious,” writes Gerhard Kapl in the documentation noting that the banner’s display was discussed at length before the match.

The report goes on to accuse the police of taking action to remove the banner without consulting either the UEFA delegate in charge of security or the venue director for the match.

“My opinion is that the removal of the banner by the police provoked the incidents,” writes Kapl on the scuffles with the Marseille fans.

The report also writes of a seat and bottles being thrown at the pitch - with one half-full Coca Cola bottle landing in the zone set aside for disabled Marseille fans, causing them to be moved to a safer part of the stadium by a UEFA official.

These unfortunate incidents are not in isolation. In February’s UEFA Cup clash against Bolton in the Spanish capital, La Liga Loca witnessed how the home side’s Ultras had free reign of the stadium and attempted to attack the area set aside for Wanderers' fans - fans whose behaviour was praised by the local police.

But none of this is the club’s responsibility, says Enrique Cerezo. “Atlético Madrid are not in control of the stadium when the game starts, but the police.”

Cerezo could not be more wrong, say UEFA in a statement. “Atlético are completely responsible for what happens inside the ground. No discussion.”

The backlash against the decision has begun in earnest in the Spanish press with Marca accusing Platini of bowing to local pressure by commenting in French paper La Provence that he had received letters from disabled Marseille fans reporting what they had suffered in Spain - fans who, of course, should have delighted in the experience of watching a game of football with bottles raining down on them.

“If the independent discipline commission does not impose a sanction that is appropriate, I’ll appeal it myself,” said Platini to the paper - evidence for Marca that the UEFA chief had it in for Atlético from the start.

Elsewhere in the game in Spain everyone has been falling in line behind Atlético Madrid with, Sevilla president, José Maria del Nido offering “solidarity to our brother clubs. They have our stadium at their disposal” - a stadium where Tottenham fans were assaulted by local police in a recent UEFA Cup clash, let’s not forget.


Torres: Denied dream return to Atletico with Liverpool 

Atlético have failed - and continue to fail - to realise that they are dealing with a different beast in UEFA. They are no longer working with the Spanish authorities who deal with situations like the Montjuic scuffles from two weeks ago, with a fine and a hope that the whole affair is quickly forgotten.

As William Gaillard, UEFA spokesman, said on Tuesday, "We are concerned about the fans. We know they face hardship and disruption and we sympathise with that, but we needed to punish Atlético Madrid. We have no alternative.”

The incidents of racist abuse may have been punished with a fine and a threat of a ground closure, but the lack of crowd control before, during and after the match - with the Marseille team coach being attacked by home fans - is a whole different area that needed the strongest of reactions from UEFA.

There are a lot of losers in this situation from the thousands of Liverpool fans whose plans have been disrupted to Fernando Torres who looks set to miss out on his homecoming.

But for once, UEFA have made the right decision.

----------------------------------------------

FourFourTwo.com: More to read...
La Liga Loca home
Blogs home 
Latest Spain news
News home
Interviews home
Forums home
FourFourTwo.com home




or to add your comments

About Tim Stannard and Simon Talbot

When he isn't fighting the evil forces of flamenco or attracting libel actions for La Liga Loca, Tim Stannard is building his media empire in Madrid. As well as contributing to Football365 and doing odd jobs elsewhere, Tim also works in the glamorous world of television as a producer, script writer, news editor, coffee boy and stand-in fluffer.

Simon Talbot? Well, he's a man of mystery.

Comments

  October 15, 2008 13:09

sameoldcabbage said:

Made the right decision, maybe, but why so late in the day, after Liverpool fans had already made their travel/hotel arrangements? Why did it take so long?

  October 15, 2008 13:14

Paul said:

It's a pretty scary place to go as an away fan.

One difference between the Calderon and montjuic incidents is That if the police had waded in,the situation would have been under contol in a second.

The spanish/catalan Police pick their fights very carefully and love wading in to Foreign away teams or home teams if you support Espanyol.

I agree with you Tim, the sooner Spanish clubs wake up to the fact that UEFA/FIFA take no notice of the Pathetic whining Spanish clubs use to justify Racism/Crowd trouble the better. I personally think the Super soft line used by the Spanish federation is also to blame too.

A two match ban is fair and if it happens again,Maybe they should be kicked out of the competition.

Let's hope Barça draw a team that Luis Figo Plays for.

  October 15, 2008 13:30

sameoldcabbage said:

Paul, I lived in Hospitalet de Llogregat for a couple of years and while I was never really up on Espanyol supporters at the time, I did come across some fairly nasty right-wing characters wearing the colours.

So my question is: how much of the Espanyol fanbase is like this? Just a question, no axes to grind!

  October 15, 2008 13:38

maspringekeunpapeldechurros said:

while Atlético are responsible for their stewards, they can't be held responsible for the action that the National police force took.

  October 15, 2008 13:58

Fletcher_Defender said:

why not just make the ban start after the Liverpool match?

thats all

  October 15, 2008 14:34

AdamCule said:

Cabbage: Having lived in Barcelona and been to Montjuic a couple of times I have to say that very few Espanyol fans are of the type you describe. The far right nutters and hardcore Spanish nationalists of the "Brigadas Blanquiazules" are very much in the minority compared with the non-violent but very passionate "Curva Jove" at the opposite end of the ground.

I know plenty of Espanyol fans who are very patriotic Catalans and the old stereotype of Espanyol being the club of ostracised Spaniards within the city of Barcelona no longer stands up, if ever it was true. One of my periko friends is worried that with the new stadium there will be an increase in the numbers of Brigadas as at the old Sarria ground there were considerably more, but that remains to be seen.

Fletcher Defender: You may be a Man Utd fan hoping to see a few scousers clubbed over the head by the madrid police, but if you're not then I would point out, as Tim has done, that the decision is probably to protect Pool fans as much as anything else. Of course it's a hassle but far better that they protect the fans by moving the game and causing a few to miss out than risk somebody being paralysed because a copper has got a bit over-zealous with his baton.

  October 15, 2008 14:36

PhilJones said:

You have to remember that this is a punishment for Atletico; For them to start it after the Liverpool match would be pointless for a number of reasons:

1- The loss of home advantage on the pitch against Liverpool is a big one for Atletico, Liverpool are easily the strongest team in the group.

2- For the Atletico fans, its a big deal to play a massive team like Liverpool at home. Prestigious, memorable, emotional etc etc. To be denied that is going to hit them fairly hard, much more so than not being able to see PSV at the Calderon. Add in the Torres factor and that increases.

The article/comments basically alludes to the fact that the Spanish teams barely seem to react to fines or 'measures' in place from the Spanish FA. To directly hit the fans and the club in a double whammy is the only thing to do. You have to remember that this isn't over a petty issue, this is widespread shouting of racial abuse at people. If you saw a man walking down a street who decided to start making money chants at someone who walked past him you'd expect tougher justice to be served than him being banned from that particular street for 2 days I think. Atletico are getting off lightly.

RE: Police force - Ateltico surely pay for the police/stewards attendance at their games therefore they are in control. The police don't attend randomly, I'm fairly certain, even though this is Spain, that there is some coordination between the club and the police force.

  October 15, 2008 15:07

Fletcher_Defender said:

Adam, point taken but if United were playin in Madrid next week and id saved and paid to go, like i did on a couple of euro aways last year. I would be more than gutted. As i understand as well, a lot of fans will not be refunded.

As much as i dont like Liverpool, UEFA making this decision with a week to spare is laughable. Why not make it the week after the Marseille trouble?

The Football authorities bring this all on themselves, another example is why they wait till April to make a decision on the Tevez saga that time, when it came to light in November the year before. If they would of decided in December that year, Sheffield United would not have grumbled.

Football needs to stop delaying key decisions.

  October 15, 2008 15:36

1927birds said:

Whilst not defending the actions of Atletico in past events, I do think there has been a massive misreading of the situation.

The article COMPLETELY fails to acknowledge security video released yesterday by the spanish home office showing that the OM fans began the violence, going so far as to charge down one of the staircases en masse and into the stewards and police. This was all in reaction to the removal (after requesting removal first) of the banner with the Totenkopf/pirate skull (depending on your interests) requested to be performed by Atletico officials AND the UEFA official at the match. Again this is the spanish side of the argument so (just like Olymique´s version who hardly have the most placid set of fans in france) should be taken with a pinch of salt. Are you telling me that even if Atletico are paying for the police´s service, that you honestly believe they have any say over whether or not the police should respond to aggression? I´m not for a second denying that spanish police are heavy handed at times, but the security videos should really be seen before simply accepting OM´s position. The mentioned plastic chairs and thrown bottles were thrown from the same section of the OM supporters, as was at least one flare that was lit. The alleged racist abuse (jeez, its just so easy now to throw "racist abuse" at anything connected to spanish sport at the moment, and a lot of it is justified, but lets remember how english fans (fans, not hooligans) are still referred to abroad as hooligans, whether there be trouble or not, just lump everyone into the same category. The UK press is treating this as a ban for racist behaviour when it is about the police v OM fans), anyway, the alleged racist abuse on the day seems to be a complete mis-hearing of the kun aguero chant that exists since he came to the club, and OM player Hilton denied any existed.

Its seems to be all about the police intervention, yet when the police at Montjuic were heavily criticised for being too lenient with barca fans and letting them take flares into the stadium.

The problem is that the spanish govt has now involved itself in the case and knowing how spanish football can go to extremes with legal action, don´t bet against them taking this to the european court.

What worries me most now is the reaction of the atletico hooligans when (if, wouldnt be surprised if marseille ban them as a preventative measure)they visit marseille.

  October 15, 2008 16:06

AdamCule said:

1927birds: It's entirely possible, as a Spanish article suggested, that the Atleti fans chant Kun in that matter because of it's similarity to the favoured form of racist abuse in Spain. The article compared the Kun chant with the Frente Atletico's chants of "Franco! Franco! Franco!"....for Leo Franco, but surely just an innocent misunderstanding...

  October 15, 2008 16:10

jmt1 said:

a way around the problem of  playing elsewhere and affecting all the travelling away support may have been to give Atletico a suspended sentence. Say 2/3 years. Any other problems then banned from europe for 10 years.

  October 15, 2008 16:38

PhilJones said:

One thing  worth mentioning with regards to the punishment is that this is perhaps to serve a warning (and punishment) not only to Ateltico, but to the rest of Spanish Football (or Spanish sport in general if you want to bring Lewis Hamilton in to it)

The whole Spain v England in 2004 is back in the press again and racist chanting is hardly a rare occurance in what is the 2nd highest profile league in the world - something certainly needs doing. Atletico are hardly being victimised here, but even those that feel they are can surely look at the wider picture and agree that only the strongest of action could be taken.

  October 15, 2008 17:27

BoroKnight said:

You know this is the sorta issue that u really need to hear both sides of the story comprehensively!

Platini, although at times erratic, is generally sound with his decisions and is a fair man.

I'm sure if this scenario happened vice-versa, he would have punished OM similarly.

But this is something i heard somewhere and i thought i'd share-

The Atletico fans kept chanting 'kun' 'kun' 'kun' for Aguero and apparently  this was taken as monkey chants by UEFA. Also, OM fans supposedly urinated over an Atletico Flag.

ALL THIS I HEARD FROM A FAN POSTING ON SKY SPORTS SO PLEASE I'M NOT THE AUTHORITY HERE!

Attacking the disabled fans was just cowardly, but it is a little strange that i dont hear Atletico Authorities saying that they have the Culprits on camera as it is clear now that CCTV has caught some of these actions on camera.

I don't know anything about Spanish fans, my education is this (marca,AS bashing...gently!) blog.

But I have respect for their team and i dont think they are generally rascist.

These elements are everywhere, but i hope they take the england way and stamp hooliganism out and work away on the rascism.

By the Way those spurs fans at Fratton Park need to be made an example off!

  October 15, 2008 19:39

Gonzalo said:

To be fair to As, they also published Guillem Balague's article roundly comdemning Atletico (www.guillembalague.com/blog_desp.php) and though I'm not a fan of Relaño's, he did make a similar plea for self-examination the previous day (www.as.com/.../Tes, my translation is at allinwhite.blogspot.com/.../against-thoughtless-racism.html) when the English FA wanted to move any proposed friendly with Spain away from the capital.

There is no question that racist abuse was chanted at the Atletico-OM match, but the UEFA punishment is slightly confusing in that it is seeking to address several issues at once. Atletico fans see themselves as victims because comparable incidents have happened plenty of times before without the same level of intervention by either UEFA or FIFA, so why now, why them?

It look slike the ban may be postponed until after Liverpool's visit and Atletico will have time to make an appeal to UEFA, who need to show consistency if they want to stamp out this sort of behaviour.

  October 15, 2008 19:40

sameoldcabbage said:

Marca and El País are reporting on their websites that the game will be played in Madrid after all, there being no time to organise the match elsewhere.

  October 15, 2008 19:59

Paul said:

sameoldcabbage- basically it's what Adam said.But what he forgot to mention is that the Right- wing now is very active at FC Mary Poppins. One of the reasons laporta went against the Boixos Nois and their splinter Group "The casuals" (yes I know) was the amount of Seig Heils and Nazi salutes that came from them.

You are right, in the past Espanyol were very Right wing of the Skinhead OI type. But nowadays there are about half a dozen who go above " La Curva Jove" where i go and they are nasty looking characters. Think that Scouse one in This is England.But they all seem to be their late 30's early 40's. now and a lot calmer.

What's very funny is that the two main bars where these guys hang out are in one of the richest parts of the city and one of them is opposite Eto'o's house.

They insult him a lot but more for his parking a Giant 4x4 in a Bus lane and not giving a f***( and Queue jumping) than anything sinister. And they sing a song about hating him because he spat at someone rather than him being black.

Even the amount of Monkey Noises has gone down, you still get one or two morons but where don't you ?.

Espanyol's fanbase draws a lot from the wealthier areas of the City so you get a lot a Young rich kids pretending to be hard in Lazio Baseball caps but when it kicks off they are the first ones running away.

I should write a book on My life in The Espanyol Firm.

I could just make it up like that Stoke fan does.

  October 15, 2008 20:04

Paul said:

Post script- Marseille away is not a place you want to go.

Looking for trouble ? it'll find you. went to see Sparta Prague there a few years ago. Not pleasant i can tell you.

  October 15, 2008 20:59

Tim Stannard said:

First off, thanks to everyone for the comments. It does seem that the game is back on again, making everything written on the blog, this week, date within nanoseconds.

Hopefully, there will be a post from the other half of La Liga Loca, tomorrow, a half that has a very, very different perspective on the whole affair.

I agree with all the posters who feel that the racism angle is being played up too much by the British press. It is. They are way wide of the mark, on this one.

I was at the game and can only recall one example of it occuring - maybe there was more, maybe there was less. One can only report one what sees or hears.

But for me, UEFA's punishment / warning boils down to Enrique's Cerezo's belief that he holds no responsibility for what happens inside the stadium.

Maybe he is right to feel that way, but the point is this is what UEFA demand - total control from the sale of pasties to the policing. Against Marseille, the police were acting without consulting with anyone - a very dangerous state of affairs.

UEFA feel / felt that Atletico lack the capacity to organise an international football match. And this is not just based on the evidence from the Marseille game but from Aberdeen, Bolton and even an Intertoto final match a couple of seasons ago, when seats were set on fire by Ultras.

Cross fingers, this whole affair will be a damned big wake-up call for the club. It needs it.

  October 16, 2008 06:05

Blanco said:

slightly off topic, but does anyone know if Betis served their 2 match stadium ban?

  October 16, 2008 06:11

kyoto said:

 Soy socio del Atlético de Madrid y estuve en el Calderón el dia del partido. Quiero hacer unas cuantas puntualizaciones para quien entienda el castellano:

 Este club es el tercer más laureado de España, sólo detrás de los colosos Real madrid y Barça, se merece un respeto. No estoy de acuerdo con el post en varias cosas.

 Desde cuando se sanciona a un club por posibles sucesos futuros, como se dice en el post, lease las visitas de Liverpool y PSV? Estás intentando decir que los hinchas de estos eqipos vienen a liarla nada más. De dónde te sacas, y esto es inaceptable, que el Atlético no tiene capacidad de organización, eso se llama prepotencia, ya que lo dices sin ninguna base, sino aporta pruebas de ello. El Calderón es un estadio 5 estrellas Uefa.

 En el campo no hubo ningún grito racista, repito ninguno,sólo se abroncó a un jugador, casualmente negro, por una entrada de tarjeta roja a Aguero, origen del segundo gol rojiblanco. Es mentira que el entrenador galo fuera atacado, que te crees que es esto? Un bar de las afueras de Stamford Bridge?

 Hay un infome de la delegación de gobierno explicando todo lo que ocurrió antes, durante y después del partido, documentate.Además el informe del delegado Uefa y el acta arbitral son totalmente favorables al club, cada uno en su ámbito.

 POr último, los fans supuestamente descapacitados del OM, despues del gol del empate de su equipo, se curaron milagrosamente, se levantaron de sus sillas de ruedas, ( milagrooo!), y empezaron a provocar a los hinchas locales, con cortes de mangas y manos en los huevos;buscalo en la web, eso merece un post, no crees?

 Por último, deja de ser tan negativo con el Atético en particular y con los equipos españoles en general.

 Ahora que lo pienso, si el OM hubiese ganado el partido y no tuviera 0 ptos, todo esto hubiera pasado?

FourFourTwo.com
Haymarket

FourFourTwo is brought to you by Haymarket Consumer Media & FourFourTwo is part of Haymarket Sport
About Haymarket | International Licensing | © Haymarket Media Group 2010