La Liga Loca

A sideways look at Spanish football


Tim Stannard and Simon Talbot

See all posts

Will the buck be passed at the Bernabeu?


Tuesday 06 January 2009 12:00

If the clowns running the show at Real Madrid were going to make a complete and utter balls-up described by a finger-wagging AS as ‘unforgivable’ and Johan Cruyff as ‘an enormous mistake’ then their timing could not have been any better.

Although the anger and ire from furious fans is still bubbling away over the club’s apparent ignorance over the UEFA ruling that only one of Klaas-Jan Huntelaar and Lassana Diarra can play in the Champions League, it could have been a ton of pancakes worse had the scandal broken before the country’s fortnight of fiestas.

In fact, the festivities are still continuing with Tuesday being a public holiday in Spain - a chance for Pedja Mijatovic to look for those two-for-one hair gel offers and Sergio Ramos to scrape the make-up off his face.

The Madrid full-back attended a Three Kings festival on Monday dressed as Baltasar but instead resembled a drag artist that had been dumped in an oil slick.


Two star signings, but only one can play. The choice is yours...

Although both Marca and AS are perceived as the lickspittling lap dogs of the bosses at Castle Greyskull - and most of the time, it’s true - the former remembers from time to time that it is, in fact, a newspaper and has a good old rage against the Madrid machine.

Quite possibly because a consignment of cigars failed to arrive on time or the ham wasn’t quite up to scratch.

And it was Marca who discovered that one of the club’s super Champions League signings would be as much use as Maniche in a game of Twister during the upcoming European campaign.

The paper wrote that they were tipped off to the offending directive that advises that only one winter signing who has already played in this season’s UEFA Cup can play in the Champions League, on Christmas Day.

Marca immediately contacted the club who denied everything, tracked down lawyers to confirm the clause and ran with the story a day later. Real Madrid published a communication explaining that, of course, they knew about the clause and that the players were signed for the future as well as this season.

The Marca response was fairly damning. In an editorial, the paper slammed the club for “galactic bonuses, Ultras at the Assembly, the Lassana presentation behind closed doors, what’s next?” referring to the presentation of the French midfielder where fans were locked out for fear of a repeat of the protests which occurred at the Huntelaar ceremony.

The obvious question to be put to Real Madrid is that if the club knew of the UEFA ruling, why wasn’t it made clear earlier and why are they now on their knees begging UEFA for special treatment?

On a similar note, why did Juande Ramos admit on Saturday that the choice he will have to make between Huntelaar and Lassana was a surprise to him?

And why did Madrid sign Huntelaar and Lassana when Calderón was promising players who were “young, quick and able to play in the Champions League?”

Marca tracked down an unimpressed but unnamed director who blamed the whole affair on Pedja Mijatovic and his assistant Carlos Bucero complaining that the former has no experience in such legal matters and the latter was a gentleman who, until recently, ran a bar in Madrid.  

With Tweedledum and Tweedledee in charge of transfers along with the club’s lawyer being Ramón Calderón’s brother - one wonders how he got that gig - it’s no great surprise that the whole affair was bungled and one player will be wasted for the next six months.


Mijatovic: "Well it ain't my fault, honest..."

Nevertheless, the club still hasn’t given up on persuading UEFA from letting them off their regrettable ruling. After all, Calderón has not spent all that time buttering up bigwigs and handing out gold tie pins for nothing.

“We are going to register two players,” was the quote from the club president in Marca last Monday. “We don’t do personal favours,” was a reply from UEFA.

According to Tuesday’s papers, Madrid’s lawyers will petition UEFA claiming that the directives preventing UEFA Cup registered footballers playing in the Champions League is against the spirit of the game.

And their legal big guns are citing the example of the eight third placed Champions League teams being allowed into the UEFA Cup as an example.

The best way out of this mess for Madrid is to admit that mistakes were made and force someone to carry the can, whether it be Calderón himself, his brother or Pedja Mijatovic - the sporting director who failed to land Ronaldo, Cazorla and Villa, drove away Robinho and pretty much upset every club in La Liga with his way of doing business.

As a last resort, they can always blame the manager. After all, it’s a tactic that’s worked well for them in the past.

----------------------------------------------

FourFourTwo.com: More to read...
La Liga Loca home
Blogs home 
Latest Spain news
News home
Interviews home
Forums home
FourFourTwo.com home


or to add your comments

About Tim Stannard and Simon Talbot

When he isn't fighting the evil forces of flamenco or attracting libel actions for La Liga Loca, Tim Stannard is building his media empire in Madrid. As well as contributing to Football365 and doing odd jobs elsewhere, Tim also works in the glamorous world of television as a producer, script writer, news editor, coffee boy and stand-in fluffer.

Simon Talbot? Well, he's a man of mystery.

Comments

  January 6, 2009 15:04

Fletcher_Defender said:

typical Madrid, they are just as bad as Man City at cocking things up.

  January 6, 2009 19:33

melihercik said:

I have only been following football for a few years, but is there an unwritten rule that English journalists must hate Real Madrid?  I have still yet to read anything in English, other than Phil Ball, that doesn't bash Real.  I'm not a Real fan, I just find it curious.  

  January 6, 2009 22:48

Tim Stannard said:

melihercik - the general rule in Spain is that you have to build some distance between the club as an institution and those running it.

Ask most Madrid, Betis, Sevilla, Valencia, Atletico, Levante, Real Sociedad, Celta Vigo and Barca (last season) fans about their presidents and the answers will often be less than positive. But it doesn't mean they hate their clubs.  

Real Madrid, the institution, belongs to the members. Their money was being spent on players that cannot be used properly. And the members were banned from welcoming the player their money bought.

  January 6, 2009 22:59

Guerrero said:

Well, there's no rule that says English-speakers must hate Real Madrid (I actually saw Matt Damon being interviewed a few years back with a Los Blancos t-shirt on). On the other hand, who needs to write anything up where the Madrid club is concerned? It's sort of like Tina Fey quoting Sarah Palin verbatim for a laugh on SNL. Finally, I'm a Barça fan, so I don't count.

  January 7, 2009 17:19

PhilJones said:

Echoing Guerrero's comments, its hardly some overly-biased opinion against Madrid thats written on here, its literally a representation of the facts. Madrid ACTUALLY do the moronic things we read about on here.

And its always fun to read about that.

  January 7, 2009 21:03

Boquerone said:

I can't see that this issue is such a big deal. After all, Madrid's Champions League campaign only has two games left to go!

  January 8, 2009 11:18

Sanchodavila said:

I have been a Real Madrid fan for more than twenty years and if this was á political party I wouldn´t be voting for it anymore. But it isn´t and I wait for every Liga og CL game with hope and anticipation and honestly can´t stop supporting them. But at the same time I sit in front of my computer and wonder how such incompetent men can rule one of the biggest clubs in the world so badly it has become a laughing stock. How can the socios tolerate this nonsense?

  January 8, 2009 11:30

rm08 said:

As a RM fan (am I really the only one who appreciates this blog??), I have to admit that bashing our president and his minions is far too easy nowadays, and a pastime I often indulge in. Our last few boards have not done the club tons of good, but at least some of them had an apparent plan for the club, whether you agreed with it or not, and real-estate implications aside.

As for the subject of this post, I'm afraid the writher misses out on a fundamental point... it is not a part of spanish culture to make leaders pay for their mistakes. It doesn't happen to our politicians, it doesn't happen to our entrepreneurs, and it certainly doesn't happen in football clubs governed by murky regulations.

Congrats on the blog, and keep bashing RM. I can only hope that when the tide turns you will be as free in your praise.

  January 8, 2009 13:55

footblog said:

I just find the entire Real machine as tiresome as the world's public and media now find Casillas' "nice guy/heart-throb" act, which was just a thing to shift some goalie shirts (which, as mentioned in FFT a few years ago, don't sell) from the club shop.

  January 8, 2009 19:44

Gonzalo said:

I'd like to echo what Tim and the other RM fans here have said - there is a clear distinction between the way fans feel about the club and the way they feel about the club's management. However, the apathy of the socios compromisarios at the last AGM means that nothing will change until the next presidential elections. And even then, nothing much will happen, as any much-needed root-and-branch reform will be ignored by the socios as they are blinded by the latest 'shiny-shiny' signing promised by all the candidates.

If idiots could fly, we'd never see the sun.

http://allinwhite.blogspot.com