FREE FourFourTwo newsletters for all!

Register now and get:
  • The inside track on the big issues
  • Tactical insight from our experts
  • Players to watch
  • Analysis & humour
  • Exclusive competitions
  • Stick-men drawings
  • WAGs, bets, bargains & more
See a sample newsletter
Sign up now to avoid disappointment
And why not check out the magazine?

La Liga Loca

A sideways look at Spanish football


Tim Stannard

See all posts

Real rally to defence of elbows-akimbo Ronaldo


Tuesday 26 January 2010 11:30

If Real Madrid actually had a pair they’d take the Cristiano Ronaldo banning business on the chin - or rather the nose - like poor old flat-faced Patrick Mtiliga had to.

NEWS, Mon Jan 25: Mtiliga nose broken by Ronaldo

“Suspend him for a decade!” they would cry.

“A thousand years! Do your worst! Don’t need him! We’re Real Madrid!”

The problem for the inhabitants of Castle Greyskull is that they have absolutely no faith in their forward line without the presence of either CR9 or Gonzalo Higuaín, who's injured.

This is especially the case ahead of Saturday night’s game against the Deportivo bogeymen at a ground where they’ve not won for nearly 20 years - a scenario that must be giving the second-placed side the biggest of willies.

So it's no surprise that the Madridista press has launched a desperate ‘Free Ronaldo!’ campaign ahead of Tuesday’s meeting of the league’s disciplinary committee in an attempt to get a fair and just outcome for their poor persecuted superstar.

And like a puppy with three legs or Arizmendi trying to play football, the campaign is a sight both endearing and pathetic.


"Ruff!"

Although the general vibe in Capital City is that a one-match suspension for Ronaldo will be tolerated - barely - despite the enormous injustice of the initial sending off, the message being beamed to la Liga’s punishers on the front pages of both Marca and AS is that a two-match ban for Ronaldo would rival anything the Burmese Junta could conjure for cruelty.

A key strategy for the defence is that the footballer under discussion is Cristiano Ronaldo, is pretty and kind to kittens.

“I just want to be allowed to play” is his front-page plea in Tuesday's Marca.

The fact that he plays for Real Madrid is crucial too, as all governing bodies in Spain clearly love Barcelona and hate Madrid.

Therefore the disciplinary committee should show mercy on this particular occasion and buck this trend of bias.

Another argument against a two-match suspension for Ronaldo is Zinedine Zidane’s declaration that Cristiano Ronaldo is not a violent player, which is akin to Phil Spector getting Charles Manson to say “you know, he’s not that bad really.”


"He was ever so quiet, kept himself to himself"

Marca have a good old straw-grasp with their contention that the referee’s report from the Málaga clash was not clear enough to warrant a two-match suspension for violent conduct because it did not make the crucial distinction of whether Ronaldo’s aggression took place on or off the ball or “at the airport” according to the paper’s “refereeing contacts.”

Pérez Lasa, the man who dared to “provoke Madridista anger over the controversial sending off,” could end up causing feelings of joy amongst the same masses over his glaring error, apparently.

AS helpfully note that Lasa chose to speak to the media over Sunday’s affair in Catalunya, with the obvious implication being that the referee is a card-carrying Barcelona fan.

However, the big defence being promoted by both papers is the “but he did it first!” strategy centred on Leo Messi’s involvement in what they claim to be a similar incident with Sevilla player Marc Valiente a few weeks back - an incident ending up with Valiente being booked for pulling on Messi’s shirt.


CR9 takes the long walk

But unlike Sunday's scuffle it was an incident that didn't end up with a nose being broken by a flying elbow – a fairly important distinction, one would have thought.

Not so, says AS editor Alfredo Relaño.

“Cristiano did exactly what Messi did, except Cristiano is bigger than the Argentinian, has longer arms, while at the same time Mtiliga is smaller than Valiente so the blows struck where they shouldn’t have.”

“Cristiano has not done anything worse than others before him,” explains Tuesday’s editorial in Marca, “so he should not be made a scapegoat.”

The “Free Ronaldo!” campaign from the Madridista press ahead of Tuesday afternoon’s meeting smacks of desperation and dark days at the Santiago Bernabeu.

It is unlikely that such a defence would be launched if Fernando Gago were in Ronaldo’s shoes.

It shows that the €100 million spent on Kaká and Karim Benzema and the presence of Raúl still isn’t enough to help a side that is one thing with Cristiano Ronaldo, but something very different without him.

------------------------------------------------
FourFourTwo.com: More to read...

Spain: La Liga Loca * Statistics * News
FFT.com: Blogs * News * Interviews * Forums * Home
Follow us: Twitter * Facebook * Twitter (LaLigaLoca)




or to add your comments

About Tim Stannard

La Liga Loca is the playground for the evil, more childish half of Tim Stannard’s psyche to be let loose. The other 50% is a contributor to FourFourTwo magazine, Football365, Sabotage Times as well as other publications such as UEFA Champions Magazine and When Saturday Comes. He is also a regular guest on Real Madrid TV’s Extra Time show and works as a TV producer extraordinaire for hire. To contact Tim directly email laligaloca@yahoo.co.uk

Comments

  January 26, 2010 13:13

Aureliano said:

I absolutely agree. The sudden 'Free Ronaldo' campaign by Marca and AS is not just desparate but is ridiculous. It's time Ronaldo is banned for the rest of the season and La Liga becomes a football league once again, instead of the soap opera, it's been converted to

  January 26, 2010 13:36

san_san12 said:

The uproar that has come about because of this just goes to show how weak and unsettled they are at Madrid. Losing one player (albeit the most expensive player in history thus far) should not result in the club setting up petitions and protests, aren't there 11 players in a team?? I dont think its right that players should be made into scapegoats either (regardless of my own personal view on ronaldo!) But pointing the finger with cries of, "But he did it first!", has the connotations of a ten year old who knows what he did was wrong and is now fearful of punishment...cue Barcelona.

  January 26, 2010 14:32

AdamCule said:

I see As are screaming about the "Villarato" again, with pictoral "evidence" on their front page of corrupt officials failing to send off Messi when he didn't hit somebody in the face resulting in a broken nose whilst when Cristiano does the same (well, er, sort of the same apart from the bit about actually making contact and breaking bones) it's a red card from the Barça loving authorities. Given this alarming evidence I can only accept that the fair thing to do is to force Barcelona's players to take to the pitch in straight jackets whilst Real Madrid's legion of heroes should be free to overcome the immoral practise of shirt pulling through the forearm smash and flying elbow forms of rehabilitation.

  January 26, 2010 14:39

somoza said:

Yes, it's a disgrace. But the hope for the Madrid fans has to be that this will act as a bit of a kick in the rear for the rest of the forwards, since it is clearly telling them that they are utterly useless and nobody believes they're good enough to win a game by themselves without Ronaldo and Higuain. Xabi, Lass, Granero, Guti, Kaka and Benzema = rubbish. Only at Real Madrid...

  January 26, 2010 14:46

somoza said:

I suspect this happened before the orders from castle greyskull came through. It is still refreshing to see though..

Marca columnist Roberto Palomar said Ronaldo's behaviour had been his "umpteenth act of idiocy this season" and slammed him for letting the team down with strikers Gonzalo Higuain injured and Ruud van Nistelrooy sold to Hamburg SV at the weekend.

"Anyone who gets sent off against Almeria and Malaga with the match already won is a fool," Palomar wrote.

"Someone needs to sit down with the lad and explain what's what because you can't go through life behaving like that."

  January 26, 2010 16:34

Vergilius said:

I still say the "elbow" (more like forearm, really) looked unintentional. I can understand why the papers are angry on this one.

  January 26, 2010 17:38

Pablo Athletic said:

The campaign just serves to remind me why i dislike that 'club of gentlemen' - Real Madrid so very much.

Even more hilarious is the current saying that in England CR9 would have been allowed to do what he did...pathetic.

I suspect that if Amorebieta splats Ronaldo's nose across his face later in the season the same papers would lead a campaign for a public hanging...

  January 26, 2010 19:16

TijuanaKid said:

It seems to me that it's more one team with Gonzalo Higuain and quite a different team without him.  Forget Ronaldo, he's Madrid's most important player.  

  January 26, 2010 20:26

Ninja Death Star said:

@Tim and Adamcule: First of all why does it matter if Mtiliga's nose was broken or not. Thats like saying that a guy who put in a 2 footed studs up challenge on a player should only get a red card if he breaks the player's leg. Messi and Ronaldo did the same thing yet with 2 different outcomes. Why?

Secondly i find it hilarious that cules, who are chronic whiners are in an uproar about some Madrid papers making a big deal about this. If Messi had been given a red for his many elbows on valiente the whole of catalonia would be up in arms asking for justice and their head clown Laporta would be running in the streets yelling "conspiracy". Cules have made a living out of playing the victim all the time and now they turn around and point the finger. Rich.

Tim, you want Madrid to take it on the chin? Why? When they feel that injustice has been done shouldn't they at least ask why that has happened? Where is the sense in taking it on the chin? "If Real Madrid had a pair". Really? How did this become a matter of cojones? Where is the sense in not appealing a red card that was wrongfully awarded to the best player on the team.

  January 26, 2010 20:29

andre3000 said:

Reviewing the incident..., i noticed that all the Malaga players rushed to the ref, pleading with him to give C.Ronaldo a straight red..., none of them had the cojones to confront him directly about his dirty play...,

were they scared???

  January 26, 2010 22:31

AdamCule said:

Ninja Death Star, assuming you're not just trying to pull off an amusing parody of an As/Marca inspired real madrid fan I will indulge you and point out that Messi didn't elbow Valiente, yes he tried to push him off and struggled to get free but at no point did he make contact with Valiente's face. I can only sigh as I type out the obvious fact that Ronaldo DID make contact (twice) and did so with devastating affect. It's the same difference between the tackle which nicks the ball and the tackle which clatters into an opponent and sends him three feet up in the air. It's a fine line but an important one. You call Ronaldo's red card injust? How so when he splattered a guy's nose all over his face and sidelined his fellow pro for nearly a month?

  January 27, 2010 00:07

JohnH said:

Guillem Balague was saying on Revista de la Liga tonight, that the referee's report doesn't say that Ronaldo intended to do it. Therefore, it shouldn't be a red card. From the FIFA rulebook,

"Violent conduct

A player is guilty of violent conduct if he uses excessive force or

brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball."

Earlier in the same match, Duda and Ramos were jumping for a header, and Ramos got an elbow to the face. It wasn't a booking, which is the correct decision. Why? Because Duda was going for the ball. Same as Ronaldo. Same as Messi.

Neither Messi nor Ronaldo should get a red card for their actions, but there is inconsistency of refereeing when comparing these two incidents. Mtiliga gets no yellow card and Ronaldo gets a red and a 2 match ban. Valiente gets a yellow card and Messi gets nothing.

I don't see why Madrid should take this on the chin. The keyword is 'intent.' The referee's report doesn't say he intended to do it, and according to reports, neither does Mtiliga. If he didn't intend to do it, it shouldn't be a red card.

  January 27, 2010 00:13

JohnPJones said:

Actually Adam, the prancing horse at the bernabeu should learn from Stoichkov and Tasotti. If you really are goping to elbow someone in the puss, (and let's face it CR9 meant this), then plase hit him properly.

Crumbs, I hate half measures.

  January 27, 2010 20:21

Paul said:

Xavi sticking up for Messi made me laugh. He of the impeccable charracter. Or was it another diving,lying cheat called Xavi ?

FourFourTwo.com
Haymarket

FourFourTwo is brought to you by Haymarket Consumer Media & FourFourTwo is part of Haymarket Sport
About Haymarket | International Licensing | © Haymarket Media Group 2010