La Liga Loca

A sideways look at Spanish football


Tim Stannard and Simon Talbot

See all posts

Respect but revulsion meets Chelsea display


Wednesday 29 April 2009 12:00

Mork and Mindy man, Robin Williams, would have been more useful than Pep Guardiola in the Dream Boys’ dressing room on Tuesday night.

What the perplexed players of the Camp Nou needed was a rousing, desk-standing, pecker-inspiring speech about following their dreams, making hay and seizing carp.

And maybe a forceful argument insisting that ‘What Dreams May Come’ is an avant-garde, thoughtful study of guilt and death. And not a load of sentimentalist tosh.

Instead, Messi’s mob may well have received a relentless rant over the lack of referee protection and how it wasn’t fair that they had to play against the most vulgar of sides whose tactics were “Cech-Drogba, Drogba-Cech” as Pep complained after the game.


"To me..."

In the first half of the Champions League encounter, it felt as if Barcelona were close to peeing their pants. Their normal fluid, flowing game was strained, passes were being misplaced and confidence was rock-bottom.

It was only in the final 30 minutes when the likes of Dani Alves and Andrés Iniesta pulled themselves together and went with the lip-stiffening did the side play anything like they have been all season.

Indeed, if it hadn’t been for that pesky Bojan missing an absolute sitter in injury-time, Barça would have had some reward for their work. Instead it was the club’s first goalless draw of the season.

Over 90 minutes, the Barcelona players crashed into more walls than a Guantanamo Bay prisoner.

It was another classic Chelsea display of power and pragmatism and exactly why the club continues to win fans the world over.

Billions spent to produce the kind of performance that a replay-seeking second division side would put up against a top flight club in the FA Cup, as one person noted on a comments board that La Liga Loca read.

However, Chelsea failed to grab an away goal with their one chance on goal and this leaves the Catalan press with hopes of a more successful game in Stamford Bridge next week.

“We will go through!” says Sport’s headline. Inside, all their editorial pieces are respectful of Chelsea’s performance, but fairly scathing.

“Anti-football won,” sighed Josep Casanovas. “It’s sad but Chelsea came not to play football but to not lose.”

“We’ll win in London,” agreed his more feisty colleague Lluís Mascaró, “with the permission of the ref,” he quipped.

It’s an opinion shared by the normally sober El País who complain that “the referee had more respect for the foreign intrusion than the local delicacy.”


"To you..."

Over in Marca-land, there has been as much coverage of the game as a mid-table clash featuring Mallorca. Which is about a page.

After all, if Florentino Pérez isn’t interested in the affair, then nor is Marca. Heaven knows what will happen if Spain’s King of Industry suddenly takes a shine to ‘Lost’.

Eight page pullouts on the programme, probably.

AS half-pretended that the European clash was important to the paper - but only in its relation to Saturday’s Madrid match - with editor Alfredo Relaño writing that “Barcelona did the attacking, but lacked the flourish.”

“The bad dream would have been completed had Jose Mourinho been in Hiddink’s place,” chuckled Fabian Ortiz.

While there seems to be a sense of outrage in the English comment-o-sphere that Chelsea were a gutless, disgrace to the beautiful game, there is more understanding in Spain in response to the English side’s parking-the-bus business.

However, while Chelsea may have won the advantage in the semi-final clash in Spain, they lost what few friends they had left in la Liga.

---------------------------------------------

FourFourTwo.com: More to read...
La Liga Loca home
Blogs home 
Latest Spain news
News home
Interviews home
Forums home
FourFourTwo.com home

La Liga Talentspotter


or to add your comments

About Tim Stannard and Simon Talbot

When he isn't fighting the evil forces of flamenco or attracting libel actions for La Liga Loca, Tim Stannard is building his media empire in Madrid. As well as contributing to Football365 and doing odd jobs elsewhere, Tim also works in the glamorous world of television as a producer, script writer, news editor, coffee boy and stand-in fluffer.

Simon Talbot? Well, he's a man of mystery.

Comments

  April 29, 2009 13:07

PhilJones said:

Sometimes you can't do much else but play like that agasint a team like Barca. As my very average sunday league coach used to say, 'you can't play football if you don't have the ball'. Barca had so much possession that all Chelsea could do was repel the attacks.

Barca's reputation preceeds them, and any team with half a brain would have taken Chelsea's stance in this kind of tie.

  April 29, 2009 17:21

psdiggs said:

I bet bayern wished they had employed Chelsea tactics in the first leg. Like it or not its a two legged affair which mean one leg is gonna be about limiting the other teams style of play. It was up to Barca to prove their style of play can overcome teams like chelsea.

  April 29, 2009 18:04

AdamCule said:

Not necessarily a bad result, chelski will have to open up a bit more in the second leg and barça should be able to take advantage. Of course Hiddink could always be playing out a 210 minute masterplan to take the tie to penalty kicks.

  April 29, 2009 19:01

andres in ny said:

EPL = Antifootball

  April 29, 2009 19:16

kbones said:

They came to the Camp Nou not to concede a goal, that's obvious and understandable. Lot of teams take that approach. But to see so-called world class players just knocking the ball high in the air...

I just cannot describe the feeling. Nor imagine how Chelsea fans could take it.

  April 29, 2009 19:24

spandidoman said:

To be fair to Chelsea if this is all Barcelona could offer (Messi best player in the world???) I do have to fear for the quality of La Liga. One wonders how Barca would cope on a trip to Stoke on a cold December evening....

  April 29, 2009 20:17

Jordi VW said:

Good points made by all. As a Barça fan i was more disappointed we couldn't break Chelsea down. Chelsea did what they had to do. Am i the only Barça fan who thinks the ref wasn't that bad ?. Ballack should have gone and to be honest so should Puyol.

Agree with Adamcule. 0-0 isn't that bad a result. We score away and the pressure is on Chelsea.

  April 29, 2009 22:14

AdamCule said:

Spandidoman, if you look at La Liga results you'll notice that Barça always struggle against mediocre sides with no ambition.

  April 29, 2009 23:28

Ivan said:

"It was another classic Chelsea display of power and pragmatism and exactly why the club continues to win fans the world over." Hilarious in the extreme,I splattered my screen with a mouthful of Muslix.Chelsea cowards...the foulest stench of English Premiership manure to be seen in years.Beyond gutless.Crash bang wallop RULES OK ...btw, the best cance missed wasn`t Bojans it was Etoos chance in the second half when he ignored Henry for the simplest of tap ins.

  April 30, 2009 01:44

blzbub said:

Lampard/Drogba or Gerrard/Torres ?

  April 30, 2009 03:41

Kxevin said:

As Ivan said, if Eto'o doesn't decide to ignore Henry (and Xavi in an earlier box exploit) in favor of personal glory, it's something like 2-0 and the English press is singing a different song.

That's life in football. I'm more curious to see what kind of back line Guardiola offers up for the London leg. One part of me says Alves/Pique/Caceres/Abidal. Another part of me puts Abidal in the center of defense, where he plays for Les Bleus, in favor of Sylvinho, who doesn't give up fouls, which means not as many set pieces for Chelsea, who don't really have an attacking winger to trouble Sylvinho all that much.

  April 30, 2009 05:43

Guerrero said:

I've said all I'm going to say on my own blog regarding that club from London. Now, Barça just have to score a tie and they're through to Rome. I think Barça's odds just improved.

  April 30, 2009 08:28

Paul said:

Totally agree with Phil Jones and good to see Barça's players taking it on the chin.

With the Ref it's Pot,kettle,black

  April 30, 2009 09:53

PhilJones said:

Barca fans seem angry that someone finally had the ability to stop them doing what they do.

EPL = antifootball?

Yeah thats why Liverpool v Arsenal was 4-4 the other week, and that Liverpool managed to beat Man Utd at Old Trafford 4-1 etc.

EPL - teams with brains.

Please rationally explain why Chelsea would have gone and played a super-open game of football at the Camp Nou in the 1st leg of the Champions League semi-final, knowing how good Barca are in attack.

I personally don't think 0-0 is a particularly good result for chelsea. I'd rather lose 2-1 and have the away goal.

  April 30, 2009 12:02

Paul said:

Yet again i agree with Phil jones. This Johann Cryuff "Anti-Football" is his way of saying "They don't like it up'em". It's the old question Would you rather win 1-0 playing boring football or lose 1-0 playing attractive football ?

Give me the three points any day

  April 30, 2009 17:18

TijuanaKid said:

As always, the ref becomes the center of attention when the coach has no answers to the real problems on the pitch.  Disappointed that Pep took this approach though.

In fairness, after seeing what Barca have done to opponents of all strengths in the Camp Nou this year, how could Chelsea play any other way?  Breaking down that backline + Essien, Ballack, Mikel is going to take inspired play and luck.  Barca had very little of either.

I'm pretty sure Chelsea will play the same way at the Bridge.  There is no reason not too.  Drogba had the best chance of the first game and will be up against Caceres and Pique in the return. Yikes.  Here comes another Guus Hiddink park the bus masterclass.

  April 30, 2009 19:03

kbones said:

To all of you who respect Chelsea for what they did (I'm not talking about quality, but approach).

Isn't it just sad that a top team, from a league that's said to be the best in the world, comes to Barcelona and does less in attack than Wisla Krakow, who played Barca in CL qualifiers, did? Even when they got the ball, they didn't do anything with it.

  April 30, 2009 21:11

PhilJones said:

I didn't enjoy the match, I hoped it would be more entertaining, but Chelsea did the job that they thought needed doing, and did it well.

Man United did similar last year against Barca and won the competition. I wonder if Alex Ferguson loses sleep over that, or the players or the fans. Unlikely.

You don't win the Champions League by playing an open game of football against Barcelona at the Camp Nou in the 1st leg of a semi-final. FACT.

Bayern barely did anything attack, they just let Barca run riot. Chelsea did equally little in attack, they can just defend a whole lot better.

  May 2, 2009 14:31

Suivaloom said:

Yes, Bayern showed the same lack of ambition as Chelsea in Camp Nou, but because Barca couldn't roll Chelsea over like the Bavarians, the players, manager and fans spit their dummies out.

I suspect the organization at the back in the Chelsea team was different to the headless chicken running about that Barca are usually presented with when playing teams in La Liga.